Umberto
Eco’s attempt to bring the past into the present or the presentness of past is
evident from his essay “Towards a New Middle Ages” wherein he draws an analogy
between the present age and the medieval ages. Eco asserts in the essay that
the present age follows a line of pattern that could be traced to the middle
ages. It is likely the continuation of the mediaeval time with increased
specialization that disrupts the inter dependence, gives rise to autonomy which
could be disastrous and results into alienation. In the essay, he discusses
specifically of the dangers of the present age in relation to the medieval
ages. The parallel he draws negates the contingency changes over the period of
time and the essay seems an exaggeration sidelining the development happened
since then. This exaggeration evolves from the ‘fantasy’ that often considered
as highly impossible but hints at the probability. Probability does not render
the essay insignificant instead makes it as valuable because the fantasy goes
into the critical inquiry into the past and links it to the present and the
probable future. With the assistance of fantasy, Umberto Eco reconstructs the
history in the present age but his reconstruction is the selective history in
order to comment on the present and the future.
Umberto Eco: Rethinking History andFiction
The prose is important for the
study of The Name of the Rose and Foucault’s Pendulum. Both the
texts revisit the middle-ages, with their own vested interests to expose
intricate cultural, social, and religious spheres. The common ground between
the two texts is the reconstruction of medieval era. The essay “Towards a New Middle Ages”
also reconstructs the middle ages. It raises some of the important themes,
which we find in the texts like – fragmentation of central authority; emergence
of radical groups, insecurity; preservation, secret groups, and production of
fake knowledge.

No comments:
Post a Comment